|
Home Up Countries Email Group for Students for Parents for Teachers for Educationalists Books DVDs etc Krishnamurti Links Contact Us
| |
return to
previous page
(This page has been imported from:
http://www.kinfonet.org/community/schools/about_schools.htm)
Although for the longest time there was resistance to starting adult study
centers, no doubt because of the very real psychological dangers posed by such
an undertaking, Krishnamurti did often endorse the formation of schools for
children. As a result, several Krishnamurti schools have come into being around
the world. The schools listed have either been either started by the
Krishnamurti Foundations or else by individuals influenced by the teachings of
Krishnamurti.
Brockwood
Park, England
What exactly constitutes a Krishnamurti school? Krishnamurti wrote several
books dealing specifically with the subject of education and had countless
discussion on this topic with the teachers and students of the schools started
by the Foundations. Throughout his lifetime Krishnamurti meticulously
documented his personal vision for the schools founded in his name. Whether or
not a particular school meets this criteria largely depends on whether all
those associated with the school - parents, students, teachers and
administration alike - all share a common understanding of its original
intention.
In the following two passages, we get a clear
and concise overview of what, in Krishnamurti's mind, is the actual intention of
the schools. The first is a statement written expressly for this purpose,
entitled The Intent of the Krishnamurti Schools, and the second is a
transcript of a response by Krishnamurti to a question about the schools in
general.
The Intent of the Krishnamurti Schools
It is becoming more and more important
in a world that is destructive and degenerating that there should be a
place, an oasis, where one can learn a way of living that is whole, sane
and intelligent. Education in the modern world has been concerned with the
cultivation not of intelligence, but of intellect, of memory and its
skills. In this process little occurs beyond passing information from the
teacher to the taught, the leader to the follower, bringing about a
superficial and mechanical way of life. In this there is little human
relationship.
Surely a school is a place where one
learns about the totality, the wholeness of life. Academic excellence is
absolutely necessary, but a school includes much more than that. It is a
place where both the teacher and the taught explore not only the outer
world, the world of knowledge, but also their own thinking, their own
behaviour. From this they begin to discover their own conditioning and how
it distorts their thinking. This conditioning is the self to which such
tremendous and cruel importance is given. Freedom from conditioning and
its misery begins with this awareness. It is only in such freedom that
true learning can take place. In this school it is the responsibility of
the teacher to sustain with the student a careful exploration into the
implications of conditioning and thus end it.
A school is a place where one learns the
importance of knowledge and its limitations. It is a place where one
learns to observe the world not from any particular point of view or
conclusion. One learns to look at the whole of man's endeavour, his search
for beauty, his search for truth and for a way of living without conflict.
Conflict is the very essence of violence. So far education has not been
concerned with this, but in this school our intent is to understand
actuality and its action without any preconceived ideals, theories or
beliefs which bring about a contradictory attitude toward existence.
The school is concerned with freedom and
order. Freedom is not the expression of one's own desire, choice or
self-interest. That inevitably leads to disorder. Freedom of choice is not
freedom, though it may appear so; nor is order conformity or imitation.
Order can only come with the insight that to choose is itself the denial
of freedom. In school one learns the importance of relationship which is
not based on attachment or possession. It is here one can learn about the
movement of thought, love and death, for all this is our life.
From the ancient of times, man has
sought something beyond the materialistic world, something beyond the
materialistic world, something immeasurable, something sacred, It is the
intent of this school to inquire into this possibility.
This whole movement of inquiry into
knowledge, into oneself, into the possibility of something beyond
knowledge, brings about naturally a psychological revolution, and from
this comes inevitably a totally different order in human relationship,
which is society. The intelligent understanding of all this can bring
about a profound change in the consciousness of mankind.
Ojai, 1984 |
The Aim of The Krishnamurti Schools
Questioner: You have often said no
one can show you the way to truth. Yet your schools are said to help their
members to understand themselves. Is this not a contradiction? Does it not
create an élite atmosphere?
Krishnamurti: The speaker has said that
there is no path to truth, that no one can lead another to it. He has
repeated this very often for the last sixty years. And the speaker with
the help of others has founded schools in India, here and in America. The
questioner says: are you not contradicting yourself when the teachers and
the students in all these schools are trying to understand their own
conditioning, educating themselves not only academically, but also
educating themselves to understand their own whole conditioning, their
whole nature, their whole psyche? One doesn't quite see the contradiction.
Since the times of ancient Greece and
ancient India, schools have been places where you learn. Learn where there
is leisure. Please go with me a little bit. You cannot learn if you have
no leisure - that is, time to yourself, time to listen to others, time to
inquire. Such a place is a school. The modern schools all over the world
are merely cultivating one part of the brain, which is engaged in the
acquisition of knowledge, technology, science, biology, theology and the
like. They are only concerned with the cultivation of a particular part of
the brain which acquires a great deal of knowledge, outer knowledge. That
knowledge can be used skilfully to earn a livelihood, or unskilfully,
depending on the person. Such schools have existed for thousands of years.
Here in these schools we are trying
something entirely different. We are trying not only to educate
academically to "O" and "A" levels, but also to cultivate an
understanding, an inquiry into the whole psychological structure of human
beings. Students come already conditioned, so there begins the difficulty.
One has not only to help generally to uncondition but also to inquire much
more deeply. This is what these schools with which we are connected are
trying to do. They may not succeed or they may. But as it is a difficult
task, one must attempt it, not always follow the easiest path. This is a
difficult subject to go into, but it doesn't create an élite. And what is
wrong with an élite? Do you want everybody and everything pulled down to
the common denominator? That is one of the troubles of so-called
democracy.
So there is no contradiction as far as
one can see. Contradiction exists only when you assert something at one
time and contradict it at another. But here we are saying that no one can
lead you to truth, to illumination, to the right kind of meditation, to
right behaviour, no one, because each one of us is responsible for
oneself, not depending on anybody at all. We are trying in all these
schools to cultivate a mind, a brain that is holistic, acquiring knowledge
for action in the world, but not neglecting the psychological nature of
man, because that is far more important than the academic career. To have
the capacity to earn a livelihood in the present world, the present
civilisation, whatever that civilisation is, a certain kind of education
is apparently necessary, and most schools in the West and in the East are
neglecting the other side, which is far deeper and greater. But here we
are trying to do both, which is something not done in other schools. We
may succeed, we hope we do, but also we may not. There is no
contradiction.
Brockwood Park, England, 1 September
1981 |
return
to top of page
return
to previous page
|