|
Home Up Countries Email Group for Students for Parents for Educationalists Books DVDs etc News Schools Krishnamurti Links Contact Us
| |
A Dialogue
with an Indian Teacher:
'WHAT
IS THE TRUE FUNCTION OF A TEACHER?' #22
"THE BANYANS
and the tamarinds dominated the small valley, which was green and alive
after the rains. In the open the sun was strong and biting, but in the
shade it was pleasantly cool. The shadows were deep, and the old trees
were shapely against the blue sky. There was an astonishing number of
birds in that valley, birds of many different kinds, and they would come
to these trees and so quickly disappear in them. There would probably be
no more rain for several months but now the countryside lay green and
peaceful, the wells were full, and there was hope in the land. The
corrupting towns were far beyond the hills, but the nearby villages were
filthy and the people were starving. The government only promised, and the
villagers seemed to care so little. There was beauty and gladness all
about them, but they had no eyes for it nor for their own inward riches.
Amidst so much loveliness the people were dull and empty".
He was a teacher with little pay and a large family, but he was
interested in education. He said he had a difficult time making ends meet,
but he managed somehow, and poverty was not a disturbing factor. Though
food was not in abundance, they had enough to eat, and as his children
were being educated freely in the school where he was teaching, they could
scrape along. He was proficient in his subject and taught other subjects
too, which he said any teacher could do who was at all intelligent. He
again stressed his deep interest in education.
"What is the function of a teacher?" he asked.
Is he merely a giver of information, a transmitter of knowledge?
"He has to be at least that. In any given society, boys and girls
must be prepared to earn a livelihood, depending on their capacities, and
so on. It is part of the function of a teacher to impart knowledge to the
student so that he may have a job when the time comes, and may also,
perhaps, help to bring about a better social structure. The student must
be prepared to face life."
That is so, sir, but aren't we trying to find out what is the
function of a teacher? Is it merely to prepare the student for a
successful career? Has the teacher no greater and wider significance?
"Of course he has. For one thing, he can be an example. By the way of
his life, by his conduct, attitude and outlook, he can influence and
inspire the student."
Is it the function of a teacher to be an example to the student? Are
there not already enough examples, heroes, leaders, without adding another
to the long list? Is example the way of education? Is it not the function
of education to help the student to be free, to be creative? And is there
freedom in imitation, in conformity, whether outward or inward? When the
student is encouraged to follow an example, is not fear sustained in a
deep and subtle form? If the teacher becomes an example, does not that
very example mould and twist the life of the student, and are you not then
encouraging the everlasting conflict between what he is and what he should
be? Is it not the function of a teacher to help the student to understand
what he is?
"But the teacher must guide the student towards a better and nobler
life."
To guide, you must know; but do you? What do you know? You know
only what you have learnt through the screen of your prejudices, which is
your conditioning as a Hindu, a Christian, or a Communist; and this form
of guidance only leads to greater misery and bloodshed, as is being shown
throughout the world. Is it not the function of a teacher to help the
student to free himself intelligently from all these conditioning
influences so that he will be able to meet life deeply and fully, without
fear, without aggressive discontent? Discontent is part of intelligence,
but not the easy pacification of discontent. Acquisitive discontent is
soon pacified, for it pursues the well worn pattern of acquisitive action.
Is it not the function of a teacher to dispel the gratifying illusion of
guides, examples and leaders?
"Then at least the teacher can inspire the student to greater
things."
Again, are you not approaching the problem wrongly, sir? If you as a
teacher infuse thought and feeling into the student, are you not making
him psychologically dependent on you? When you act as his inspiration,
when he looks up to you as he would to a leader or to an ideal, surely he
is depending on you. Does not dependence breed fear? And does not fear
cripple intelligence?
"But if the teacher is not to be either an inspirer, an example, or a
guide, then what in heaven's name is his true function?"
The moment you are none of those things what are you? What is your
relationship with the student? Did you previously have any relationship
with the student at all? Your relationship with him was based on an idea
of what was good for him, that he ought to be this or that. You were the
teacher and he was the pupil; you acted upon him, you influenced him
according to your particular conditioning so, consciously or unconsciously
you moulded him in your own image. But if you cease to act upon him, then
he becomes important in himself, which means that you have to understand
him and not demand that he should understand you or your ideals, which are
phony anyway. Then you have to deal with what is and not with what should
be.
Surely, when the teacher regards each student as a unique in-dividual
and therefore not to be compared with any other, he is then not concerned
with system or method. His sole concern is with `helping' the student to
understand the conditioning influences about him and within himself, so
that he can face intelligently without fear, the complex process of living
and not add more problems to the already existing mess.
"Are you not asking of the teacher a task that is far beyond him?"
If you are incapable of this, then why be a teacher? Your question
has meaning only if teaching is a mere career to you, a job like any
other, for I feel that nothing is impossible for the true educator.
"Commentaries on Living" II, chapter 31
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
return
to top of page
return to
"for teachers" page
|
|