Quotations

Home
Up
Countries
Email Group
for  Students
for Parents
for Teachers
for Educationalists
Books DVDs etc
News
Schools
Links
Contact Us

if any visitor to this page has a quote from Krishnamurti that they feel has special significance to them, we will endeavour to include it here.

 you may send it, with its source, to:

    So beauty is...
   What thought thinks about...
   What have you done with your life?
   Question: The hope that tomorrow will solve our problems..
   As a cloud hurried by the wind...
   Freedom from the desire for an answer...
   Questioner: How you live, how you think, what you do...
   Do you think it is possible ...
   The brain has extraordinary capacity ...
   Why do we give such significance to...
   Belief is merely...
   Questioner (student); How do you know all these things...
   Once in India I was travelling...
    If you set out to meditate...
    Question: You say the present crisis...
    Questioner: Did you seriously mean...
 
 
So beauty is, where you are not. It is a tragedy if you don't see this.
Truth is, where you are not. Beauty is, love is, where you are not.
We are not capable of looking at this extraordinary thing called truth.
 

Mumbai 4th Public Talk, January 31, 1982
 
 

 

What thought thinks about is made into a reality but it's not the truth. Beauty can never be the expression of thought. A bird is not made by thought and so it's beautiful. Love is not shaped by thought and when it is it becomes something quite different. The worship of the intellect and its integrity is a reality made by thought. But it is not compassion. Thought cannot manufacture compassion; it can make it into a reality, a necessity, but it will not be compassion. Thought by its very nature is fragmentary and so it lives in a fragmented world of division and conflict. So knowledge is fragmentary and however much it is piled up, layer after layer, it will still remain fragmented, broken up. Thought can put together a thing called integration and that too will be a fragment.

 

Krishnamurti's Journal
Malibu 38th Entry
3rd April 1975

return to top of page

 

 

"What have you done with your life?
 
You have lived 30 years, or 80 years. What have you done with your life?
 
Yes sir.
 
Don't say I'm going to fulfil next life. There is only the present. The beauty of the present. The richness of the present.
 
You've has this life, this extraordinary thing called life, in which there is sorrow, pleasure, fear. Guilt, and all the tortures and the loneliness, and the despair of life. And the beauty of life. You've had it. And what have you done with it?
 
Do consider it.
 
And it's very important to ask, and to answer it. Not to the speaker, to your self.
 
When you ask it, don't go to bed with sorrow because you have done nothing. You've done absolutely nothing. A life was given to you, the most precious thing in the world, and what have you done? Distorted it, tortured it, torn it to pieces. Divided it. Brought about violence, destruction, hatred. Without love, without compassion, without passion.
 
So when you ask, and I hope you are asking, seriously, what you have done with your life; when you ask that question inevitably, if you are all sensitive, you'll have tears in your eyes. But, you'll have tears because you're thinking of the past, what you might have done. Tears are self pity. So don't have tears. For the question is asked, and the answer lies only in the present. Not tomorrow or in the past. Which means what are you doing now? With your life that has been given. Now, not tomorrow. And if you can answer it you will find out what love is."
 
Talk 5 Bombay 14th Dec. 1969
 

return to top of page

 
 
 
Question: The hope that tomorrow will solve our problems prevents our seeing the absolute urgency of change. How does one deal with this?

     What do you mean by the future, what is future? If one is desperately ill, tomorrow has meaning; one may be healed by tomorrow. So one must ask, what is this sense of future? We know the past; we live in the past, which is the opposite movement; and the past, going through the present, modifying itself, moves to that which we call the future.
     First of all, are we aware that we live in the past - the past that is always modifying itself, adjusting itself, expanding and contracting itself, but still the past - past experience, past knowledge, past understanding, past delight, the pleasure which has become the past?
     The future is the past, modified. So one's hope of the future is still the past moving to what one considers to be the future. The mind never moves out of the past. The future is always the mind acting, living, thinking in the past.
     What is the past? It is one's racial inheritance, one's conditioning as Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Catholic, American and so on. It is the education one has received the hurts the delights, as remembrances. That is the past. That is one's consciousness. Can that consciousness, with all its content of belief, dogma, hope, fear, longing and illusion, come to an end? For example, can one end, this morning, completely, one's dependence on another? Dependence is part of one's consciousness. The moment that ends, something new begins, obviously. But one never ends anything completely and that non-ending is one's hope. Can one see and end dependence and its consequences, psychologically, inwardly? See what it means to depend and the immediate action taking place of ending it. Now is the content of one's consciousness to be got rid of bit by bit? That is, get rid of anger, then get rid of jealousy, bit by bit. That would too long. Or, can the whole thing be done instantly, immediately? for taking the contents of one's consciousness and ending them one by one, will take many years, all one's life perhaps. Is it possible to see the whole and end it - which is fairly simple, if one does it? But one's mind is so conditioned that we allow time as a factor in change.

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
 11TH QUESTION OJAI, CALIFORNIA
2ND QUESTION & ANSWER MEETING
8TH MAY 1980 'HOPE'

return to top of page

 

 

 
As a cloud hurried by the winds across the valley so is man wherever he be, hurried along through life. Man has no fixed purpose, man has no understanding of the meaning of life, but is as the clouds that have no resting place, that are chased from valley to valley, that have no quietude, no tranquillity, no peace. Man has no goal. He is blind to the purpose of life and there is chaos and disintegration in him and hence in the world.
 
LIFE THE GOAL page 1

return to top of page

 

 

"Freedom from the desire for an answer is essential to the understanding of a problem".
 
COMMENTARIES ON LIVING SERIES I
CHAPTER 41 'AWARENESS'
 

return to top of page

 

 
Questioner: How you live, how you think, what you do, will create the world, or destroy the world. We do not realize this. We do not see this responsibility, and so we say, `Technical knowledge is bringing about the destruction of man; how can that be prevented?'

Krishnamurti: The good is not the `respectable'. The respectable man can never know what is good. Most of us are respectable and therefore we do not know what it is to be good. Moral education can only come, not with the cultivation of respectability, but with the awakening of love. But we do not know what love is. Is love something to be cultivated? Can you learn it in colleges, in schools, from teachers, from technicians, from the following of your gurus? Is devotion love? And if it is, can the man who is respectable, who is devoted, know love? Do you know what I mean by respectability? Respectability is when the mind is cultivating, when the mind is becoming virtuous. The respectable man is the man who is struggling consciously not to be envious, the man who is following tradition, he who says, `What will
people say'? Respectability will obviously never know what Truth is, what good is, because the respectable man is only concerned with himself.

from Krishnamurti's third talk in Poona 1953
 

return to top of page

 
 
 
DB:   Do you think it is possible that a thing like this could divert the course of mankind away from the dangerous path it is taking?
 
K:  Yes, that is what I think. But to divert the course of man's destruction somebody must listen. Right? Somebody - ten people - must listen!
 
DB:   Yes.
 
K:   Listen to that immensity calling.
 
THE ENDING OF TIME CHAPTER 8 19TH APRIL 1980 CONVERSATION WITH PROF. DAVID BOHM
'CAN INSIGHT BE AWAKENED IN ANOTHER'

return to top of page

 

 

"Sir", I said, "twenty years ago I heard you say that one must enter the house of death with all one's senses fully alert, not when one is old and decrepit".
 
"Yes", he replied. "For me the line dividing life and death has always been very thin."....(cut)
 
"What would happen if you were told that you were going to die tomorrow morning", I asked.
 
He said, "Nothing. I would live exactly as before. The thought that death was so imminent wouldn't enter my mind again, and nothing would change".

 

From a conversation between Krishnamurti and Asit Chanmal. Taken from Chandmal's book "One Thousand Suns".

 

return to top of page

 
So we are saying the brain has an extraordinary capacity but that brain has been restricted, narrowed down by our education, our self interest.
 
1st Public Question & Answer Meeting
Brockwood Park 1985.

return to top of page

 
 
Why do we give such deep significance and meaning to the unconscious? - for after all, it is as trivial as the conscious. If the conscious mind is extraordinarily active, watching, listening, seeing, then the conscious mind becomes far more important than the unconscious; in that state all the contents of the unconscious are exposed; the division between the various layers comes to an end. Watching your reactions when you sit in a bus, when you are talking to your wife, your husband, when in your office, writing, being alone - if you are ever alone - then this whole process of observation, this act of seeing (in which there is no division as the `observer' and the `observed') ends the contradiction.
 
The Flight of the Eagle Chapter 2
 
return to top of page
 
 
Belief is merely a self-protective covering for the mind.

 

"Sutras on Life" page 36
 

 

 
Questioner (student):   "How do you know all these things that you are talking about?"

Krishnamurti:   "Not from books. Not from other people. Not from ancient or modern books, not from philosophies, and so on".

from a discussion with staff and students at
Brockwood Park, 1983

 

return to top of page

 

 
Once in India I was travelling in a car. There was a chauffeur driving and I was sitting beside him. There were three gentlemen behind discussing awareness very intently and asking me questions about awareness, and unfortunately at that moment the driver was looking somewhere else and he ran over a goat, and the three gentlemen were still discussing awareness - totally unaware that they had run over a goat. When the lack of attention was pointed out to those gentlemen who were trying to be aware it was a great surprise to them.
 
FREEDOM FROM THE KNOWN CHAPTER 3
 
return to top of page
 
 

 

If you set out to meditate it will not be meditation. If you set out to be good, goodness will never flower. If you cultivate humility, it ceases to be. Meditation is like the breeze that comes in when you leave the window open; but if you deliberately keep it open, deliberately invite it to come, it will never appear.
 
J. Krishnamurti The Only Revolution India Part 6
 
 
 

 

Question: You say the present crisis is without precedent. In what way is it exceptional?
 
Krishnamurti:  Obviously the present crisis throughout the world is exceptional, without precedent. There have been crises of varying types at different periods throughout history, social, national, political. Crises come and go; economic recessions, depressions, come, get modified, and continue in a different form. We know that; we are familiar with that process. Surely the present crisis is different, is it not? It is different first because we are dealing not with money nor with tangible things but with ideas. The crisis is exceptional because it is in the field of ideation. We are quarrelling with ideas, we are justifying murder; everywhere in the world we are justifying murder as a means to a righteous end, which in itself is unprecedented. Before, evil was recognized to be evil, murder was recognized to be murder, but now murder is a means to achieve a noble result. Murder, whether of one person or of a group of people, is justified, because the murderer, or the group that the murderer represents, justifies it as a means of achieving a result which will be beneficial to man. That is we sacrifice the present for the future - and it does not matter what means we employ as long as our declared purpose is to produce a result which we say will be beneficial to man. Therefore, the implication is that a wrong means will produce a right end and you justify the wrong means through ideation. In the various crises that have taken place before, the issue has been the exploitation of things or of man; it is now the exploitation of ideas, which is much more pernicious, much more dangerous, because the exploitation of ideas is so devastating, so destructive. We have learned now the power of propaganda and that is one of the greatest calamities that can happen: to use ideas as a means to transform man. That is what is happening in the world today. Man is not important - systems, ideas, have become important. Man no longer has any significance. We can destroy millions of men as long as we produce a result and the result is justified by ideas. We have a magnificent structure of ideas to justify evil and surely that is unprecedented. Evil is evil; it cannot bring about good. War is not a means to peace. War may bring about secondary benefits, like more efficient aeroplanes, but it will not bring peace to man. War is intellectually justified as a means of bringing peace; when the intellect has the upper hand in human life, it brings about an unprecedented crisis.
 
THE FIRST AND LAST FREEDOM
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
QUESTION 1 'ON THE PRESENT CRISIS'
 
return to top of page
 

 

 

Questioner:   Did you seriously mean what you said when you suggested last week that one should retire from the world when one is around forty-five or so?
 
Krishnamurti:   I suggested this seriously. Almost all of us, till death overtakes us, are so caught up in worldliness that we have no time to search out deeply, to discover the real. To retire from the world necessitates a complete change in educational and economic systems, does it not? If you did retire, you would be unprepared, you would be lost, you would be lonely, you would not know what to do with yourself. You would not know how to think. You would probably form new groups, new organizations with new beliefs, badges and labels, and once again be active outwardly, doing reforms which will need further reform. But this is not what I mean. To retire from the world you must be prepared: by right kind of occupation, by creating right kind of environment, by setting up the right State, by right education and so on. If you have been so prepared then to withdraw from worldliness at any age is the natural not abnormal sequence; you withdraw to flow into deep and pure awareness, you withdraw not into isolation but to find the real; to help to transform the ever congealing, conflicting society and State. All this would involve a wholly different kind of education, an upheaval in our social and economic order. Such a group of people would be completely disassociated from authority, from politics, from all those causes which produce war and antagonism between man and man. A stone may direct the course of a river; so a small number may direct the course of a culture. Surely any great thing is done in this manner. You will probably say most of us cannot retire however much we may want to. Naturally all cannot but some of you can. To live alone or in a small group requires great intelligence. But if you really thought it worthwhile then you would set about it, not as a wonderful act of renunciation but as a natural and intelligent thing for a thoughtful man to do. How extraordinarily important it is that there should be at least some who do not belong to any particular group or race or to any specialized religion or society! They will create the true brotherhood of man for they will be seeking truth. To be free from outward riches there must be the awareness of inward poverty, which brings untold riches. The stream of culture may change its course through a few awakened people. These are not strangers but you and me.
 
J. Krishnamurti Ojai 5th Public Talk 11th June, 1944.

 

return to top of page
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~